Auschwitz: the end of a legend : critique of Jean-Claude Pressac

Carlo Mattogno

Institute for Historical Review

When appearing in German wartime documents in the context of the "Holocaust," terms like "special treatment," "special action," and others have usually been interpreted as code words that signify the killing of inmates. While certainly the term "special treatment" in many such documents meant execution, the term need not always have had that meaning in German records. In "Special Treatment in Auschwitz," Carlo Mattogno has provided the most thorough study of this textual problem to date. Publishing and interpreting numerous such documents about Auschwitz--many of them hitherto unknown--Mattogno is able to show that, while "special" had many different meanings in these documents, not a single one meant "execution." This important study demonstrates that the habitual practice of deciphering an alleged "code language" by assigning homicidal meaning to completely harmless documents--a key component of the exterminationist historical method--is no longer tenable.

Special Treatment in Auschwitz: Origin and Meaning of a Term (Holocaust Handbooks)

Theses & Dissertations Press

Appearing in German wartime documents in the context of the “Holocaust,” terms like “special treatment,” “special action,” and others have usually been interpreted as code words that signify homicides. While certainly the term “special treatment” in many such documents meant at times execution, the term need not always have had that meaning in German records. This is especially true when it comes to the infamous Auschwitz camp. In Special Treatment in Auschwitz, Carlo Mattogno has provided the most thorough study of this textual problem to date. By publishing and interpreting numerous such documents about Auschwitz – many of them hitherto unknown – Mattogno is able to show that, while “special” had many different meanings in these documents, not a single one meant “execution.” Keying off the German root word “sonder,” an adjective signifying any of a wide range of distinctive qualities, the study examines a group of related terms such as gesonderte Unterkunft, which translates roughly to “separate accommodations.” The entire work highlights the potency of a traditional tool of the unscrupulous propagandist: (mis-)translation, a perfidious practice of which Marie Antoinette (“Let them eat cake.”) is perhaps but the most-famous and most-unfortunate example. This important study demonstrates also the insidious allegation of the use of a “code language” by the National Socialists of Germany, imputing homicidal meanings to completely harmless documents. 2nd, corrected and updated edition of 2016.

Special Treatment in Auschwitz: Origin and Meaning of a Term

Castle Hill Publishers

The novelists and movie-makers James and Lance Morcan have produced a book “to end [Holocaust] denial once and for all.” To do this, “no stone was left unturned” to verify historical assertions by presenting “a wide array of sources” meant “to shut down the debate deniers wish to create. One by one, the various arguments Holocaust deniers use to try to discredit wartime records are carefully scrutinized and then systematically disproven.” They headlined the book Debunking Holocaust Denial Theories. Drumroll! Fanfare! Unfortunately, it’s a grand feint, and the present study proves it. First, the Morcans did not address revisionist arguments at all. In fact, they completely ignored the vast amount of recent scholarly studies published by revisionists; they didn’t even identify them. Instead, they engaged in shadowboxing, creating some imaginary, bogus “revisionist” scarecrow – a mélange of distorted or completely invented alleged “denier” arguments – which they then tore to pieces. In addition, their knowledge even of their own side’s source material was dismal, and the way they backed up their misleading or false claims was pitifully inadequate. F for FAIL.

Fail : Debunking Holocaust Denial Theories: How James and Lance Morcan Botched Their Attempt to Affirm the Historicity of the Nazi Genocide

Germar Rudolf

Everyone knows Dr. Josef Mengele, the evil Auschwitz doctor who sent countless Jews to the gas chambers, performed cruel, pointless medical experiments on inmates, and gave twin research a bad reputation. But how do we "know" about his many diabolic deeds?The most important source for what Mengele is said to have done at Ausch-witz comes from the Hungarian Jew MiklOs Nyiszli, a forensic physician who claims to have been Dr. Mengele's assistant at Auschwitz. In 1946, he published a book about his traumatic experiences while he was at Auschwitz. Over the years, his book has been translated into all major languages of Europe. It has become one of the mainstays of the orthodox Auschwitz narrative, right next to the testimonies of other key witnesses, such as that of the former Auschwitz commandant Rudolf HOss, or of Elie Wiesel.As influential as Nyiszli's book has been in forming the world's opinion about Auschwitz, Nyiszli's various writings have never been subjected to thorough critical scrutiny. The present book changes this.Part 1 of this book contains a faithful translation of the original 1946 edition of Nyiszli's Hungarian book, while Part 2 makes publicly accessible for the first time essential excerpts of much-less known postwar texts by and about Nyiszli.Part 3 thoroughly scrutinizes Nyiszli's writings with what we know to be true about Auschwitz from solid material facts and authentic documentation, while Part 4 compares his various claims with what other inmate doctors have stated who were in a similar position at Auschwitz as Nyiszli claims for himself.Part 5 takes a critical look into how orthodox historians have dealt with Nyiszli's texts, while a short essay in the Appendix lays bare the mythical nature of the clichE of Dr. Mengele as the "Angel of Death."The author's conclusion is dispositive: "Nyiszli was either an extraordinary impostor or a lunatic; there is no escaping from the dilemma. And both horns of this dilemma - shameless mendacity or lunacy - disqualify Nyiszli and completely destroy his credibility."

An Auschwitz Doctor's Eyewitness Account

Miklós Nyiszli

Belzec: Propaganda, Testimonies, Archeological Research and History

Während des Krieges kursierten wilde Gerüchte über das berüchtigte Lager Auschwitz: Die Deutschen testeten dort neue Kampfgase; Häftlinge wurden in Elektrokammern, Gasduschen oder mit pneumatischen Hämmern ermordet; lebende Menschen wurden auf Förderbändern direkt in Kremierungsöfen geschickt; Öl, Fett und Seife wurde aus den Massenmordopfern gemacht. Nichts davon war wahr.Als die Sowjets Anfang 1945 Auschwitz eroberten, berichteten sie, dass Häftlinge auf Starkstromfließbändern getötet wurden, die ihre Opfer direkt in riesige Öfen warfen; dass dort mindestens 4 Millionen Menschen ermordet worden seien. Auch das war nicht wahr.In den unmittelbaren Nachkriegsjahren wiederholten "Zeugen" und "Experten" diese Dinge und fügten dem weitere Phantasien hinzu: dass Insassen mit Gasbomben oder in Gaskammern aus Zeltplanen ermordet wurden; dass die Böden der Gaskammern sich nach unten öffneten, um die Leichen zu entladen; dass Loren sowohl Leichen als auch lebende Menschen direkt in die Öfen kippten; dass die Krematorien von Auschwitz 400 Millionen Opfer verbrannt haben könnten... Wiederum war alles unwahr.Dieses Buch gibt einen Überblick über die vielen Gerüchte, Mythen und Lügen über Auschwitz, die etablierte Historiker heute als unwahr zurückweisen. Es erklärt dann, mit welchen lächerlichen Methoden manche Behauptungen über Auschwitz als wahr akzeptiert und in "Geschichte" umgewandelt wurden, obwohl sie ebenso unwahr sind.

Auschwitz : Ein Dreiviertel Jahrhundert Propaganda

Belzec

See the best price to sell, buy, or rent books by Carlo Mattogno. BookScouter helps to compare book prices from 25+ online bookstores and 30+ buyback vendors with a single search.

Books by Carlo Mattogno