9/11 on Trial: The World Trade Center Collapse

Fact vs. Fiction about 9/11 What if the “official” version of events on 9/11 could be disproven solely on the basis of physics, mathematical equations, scientific formulas, physical evidence, and expert testimony – without the use of a single “conspiracy theory”? Might this dramatically alter your perspective on 9-11 and the war and “security” policies that are based on it? That is exactly how “9-11 on Trial” disproves the government’s official story – which it happens to be using to suspend our normal, peaceful, constitutional American way of life. Did you know that never before nor since 9/11 has a steel building ever collapsed due to fire? Yet on 9-11, three of them supposedly did just that in seven hours – with WTC 7 not even being hit by an airliner. All three steel-frame buildings hit the ground at free-fall speed – physically impossible unless all resistance beneath was blown away by controlled demolition. Even the government admitted in their final FEMA report that “The heat produced by burning jet fuel does not by itself appear to have been sufficient to initiate the structural collapse.” How to explain the pools of molten steel which were found bubbling 70 feet beneath the towers five weeks after 9-11? A temperature of 5,182 F is needed to melt steel – yet the estimated heat of the fires in the WTC was only between 300 F and 500 F, and jet fuel can only reach a maximum temperature of 1,517 F – in ideal conditions. 9/11 on Trial is the final answer to obfuscation, intimidation and disinformation, because it is clarity itself.