Game Theory and National Security
Released: Jan 08, 1991
Publisher: Wiley/Blackwell
Format: Hardcover, 216 pages
Related ISBN: 9781557860040
Description:
In this path-breaking theoretical work, political scientist Steven Brams and mathematician Mark Kilgour show how game theory can be applied to the rigorous development and thoughtful analysis of several critical problems that afflict the security of nations, from the deterrence of foes who might launch attacks, to the stabilization of crises that could explode into wars. In addition, they analyze a variety of related questions, including the interlocking preferences that fuel arms races, the strategic impact that Star Wars may have on nuclear deterrence, and optimal strategies for verifying arms control treaties. Of interest to students on international relations and foreign policy as well as those concerned with the formal analysis of conflict, Game Theory and National Security provides new foundations for understanding the rational basis of international conflict.
Best prices to buy, sell, or rent ISBN 9781557860033
Frequently Asked Questions about Game Theory and National Security
You can buy the Game Theory and National Security book at one of 20+ online bookstores with BookScouter, the website that helps find the best deal across the web. Currently, the best offer comes from and is $ for the .
The price for the book starts from $26.79 on Amazon and is available from 18 sellers at the moment.
If you’re interested in selling back the Game Theory and National Security book, you can always look up BookScouter for the best deal. BookScouter checks 30+ buyback vendors with a single search and gives you actual information on buyback pricing instantly.
As for the Game Theory and National Security book, the best buyback offer comes from and is $ for the book in good condition.
The Game Theory and National Security book is in very low demand now as the rank for the book is 1,310,882 at the moment. A rank of 1,000,000 means the last copy sold approximately a month ago.
Not enough insights yet.