Who's Bashing Whom?: Trade Conflict in High Technology Industries
Description:
This study seeks to resolve the "free trade vs. managed trade" debate. It provides innovative recommendations for US policy based on detailed and rigorous case studies of high-technology trade conflicts between the United States, Japan and Europe in aircraft, telecommunications, electronics and supercomputers.The study addresses three key issues: What trade policy should the United States adopt to support its high-technology industries? What domestic policy initiatives are necessary to realize this goal? Are new international rules needed to reduce trade conflicts over high-technology industries? Tyson, formerly Chair of the President's Council of Economic Advisers, develops a "cautious activist" policy agenda to promote US competitiveness in high-technology sectors and to strengthen international rules to encourage trade and reduce conflicts among nations.
Best prices to buy, sell, or rent ISBN 9780881321067
Frequently Asked Questions about Who's Bashing Whom?: Trade Conflict in High Technology Industries
The price for the book starts from $6.31 on Amazon and is available from 45 sellers at the moment.
At BookScouter, the prices for the book start at $1.34. Feel free to explore the offers for the book in used or new condition from various booksellers, aggregated on our website.
If you’re interested in selling back the Who's Bashing Whom?: Trade Conflict in High Technology Industries book, you can always look up BookScouter for the best deal. BookScouter checks 30+ buyback vendors with a single search and gives you actual information on buyback pricing instantly.
As for the Who's Bashing Whom?: Trade Conflict in High Technology Industries book, the best buyback offer comes from and is $ for the book in good condition.
The Who's Bashing Whom?: Trade Conflict in High Technology Industries book is in very low demand now as the rank for the book is 3,330,745 at the moment. A rank of 1,000,000 means the last copy sold approximately a month ago.
Not enough insights yet.