Are Persons Property?: Legal Debates About Property and Personality (Applied Legal Philosophy)

(10)
Are Persons Property?: Legal Debates About Property and Personality (Applied Legal Philosophy) image
ISBN-10:

0754620328

ISBN-13:

9780754620327

Publisher: Ashgate Pub Ltd
Format: Hardcover, 209 pages

Description:

The idea that persons are now all free and equal is supposed to be fundamental to modern liberal legal systems. However, this text questions that ideal. It looks at slavery and the philosophical and legal reasonings as to why it should no longer exist, but reminds us that this is not the case. It appears though that slavery is not the only situation whereby a person could be considered property, and this work seeks to prove the point. In the course of the book the authors suggest that in a number of important respects, persons can still be rendered unfree and effectively reduced to something akin to the property of another in certain situations and under certain conditions. The text also questions the purity of the modern property/personality distinction.

Best prices to buy, sell, or rent ISBN 9780754620327




Frequently Asked Questions about Are Persons Property?: Legal Debates About Property and Personality (Applied Legal Philosophy)

You can buy the Are Persons Property?: Legal Debates About Property and Personality (Applied Legal Philosophy) book at one of 20+ online bookstores with BookScouter, the website that helps find the best deal across the web. Currently, the best offer comes from and is $ for the .

If you’re interested in selling back the Are Persons Property?: Legal Debates About Property and Personality (Applied Legal Philosophy) book, you can always look up BookScouter for the best deal. BookScouter checks 30+ buyback vendors with a single search and gives you actual information on buyback pricing instantly.

As for the Are Persons Property?: Legal Debates About Property and Personality (Applied Legal Philosophy) book, the best buyback offer comes from and is $ for the book in good condition.

Not enough insights yet.

Not enough insights yet.