When PowerPoint® for Litigators was first published two years ago, it sold thousands of copies and garnered top awards, including ACLEA’s 2000 Award of Professional Excellence. Now, Deanne C. Siemer and Frank D. Rothschild present PowerPoint® 2002 for Litigators. This newest edition focuses on the improved persuasive capabilities of PowerPoint version 2002, included in the Office XP suite. Written by litigators for litigators, PowerPoint® 2002 for Litigators teaches you how to create and fashion PowerPoint slide presentations for successful advocacy in trial, mediation, arbitration, and appeal. A case file is included so that readers can learn step by step how to prepare and animate bulleted lists, document and photographic enlargements, callouts, time lines, relationship charts, and annotated diagrams. In addition, this book covers the new animation features of PowerPoint 2002, as well as collaborating and using narrations in slide shows, using audio clips, creating argument slides, and much more. PowerPoint® 2002 for Litigators includes a CD with a number of electronic exhibits for the case file. The exhibits include video clips, photographs, diagrams, transcripts, and other documents. The CD also contains a PowerPoint slide show for the case file with examples of the slides you will learn to create by using this book. By putting the learning exercises into a professional context, you can apply what you learn quickly and effectively. With this book learn how to: Prepare bullet lists for your openings Use animation features to make your points memorable Make the most of photo exhibits with PowerPoint’s labels Build slides that explain document exhibits effectively Use slides with video clips for cross-examination Avoid (and respond to) objections to your slides Display timelines to track key events Narrate slide shows for settlement Create argument slides for strong closings

Powerpoint 2002 for Litigators

Siemer, Deanne C.

Rothschild, Frank D.

Natl Inst for Trial Advocacy

An inattentive moment costs a woman her life—the question is, which party wasn't paying attention? Charles Shrackle's truck strikes and kills Katherine Potter as she is crossing the street in Nita City. In the wrongful death action brought by her estate, the plaintiff claims Shrackle failed to yield to Katherine Potter as she crossed in the crosswalk. Shrackle claims that Mrs. Potter stepped out in front of his truck from the median, well away from the crosswalk. Conflicting eyewitnesses support both versions of the accident.
This classic file is ideal for teaching basic trial skills. It has been updated to include social media exhibits and text messages, but the basic questions remain. Was Katherine Potter crossing in a crosswalk? Was the accident caused by the use of a cell phone? Was Jeffrey Potter involved in an affair when his wife died? There are six witnesses for the plaintiff and four witnesses for the defendants.
The revised Seventh Edition now has four versions: Trial, Faculty, Plaintiff and Defendant.
Revision based on the original file created by Kenneth S. Broun and James H. Seckinger.

Potter v. Shrackle and The Shrackle Construction Company: Case File, Trial Materials (NITA)

Broun, Kenneth S.

Legal Education

Wolters Kluwer

An inattentive moment costs a woman her life—the question is, which party wasn’t paying attention?; Charles Shrackle''s truck strikes and kills Katherine Potter as she is crossing the street in Nita City. In the wrongful death action brought by her estate, the plaintiff claims Shrackle failed to yield to Katherine Potter as she crossed in the crosswalk. Shrackle claims that Mrs. Potter stepped out in front of his truck from the median, well away from the crosswalk. Conflicting eyewitnesses support both versions of the accident. This classic file is ideal for teaching basic trial skills. It has been updated to include social media exhibits and text messages, but the basic questions remain. Was Katherine Potter crossing in a crosswalk? Was the accident caused by the use of a cell phone? Was Jeffrey Potter involved in an affair when his wife died? There are six witnesses for the plaintiff and four witnesses for the defendants.; The revised Seventh Edition now has four versions: Trial, Faculty, Plaintiff and Defendant. Revision based on the original file created by Kenneth S. Broun and James H. Seckinger.;

Potter v. Shrackle and The Shrackle Construction Company: Deposition File, Faculty Materials (NITA)

An inattentive moment costs a woman her life--the question is, which party wasn't paying attention?; Charles Shrackle''s truck strikes and kills Katherine Potter as she is crossing the street in Nita City. In the wrongful death action brought by her estate, the plaintiff claims Shrackle failed to yield to Katherine Potter as she crossed in the crosswalk. Shrackle claims that Mrs. Potter stepped out in front of his truck from the median, well away from the crosswalk. Conflicting eyewitnesses support both versions of the accident. This classic file is ideal for teaching basic trial skills. It has been updated to include social media exhibits and text messages, but the basic questions remain. Was Katherine Potter crossing in a crosswalk? Was the accident caused by the use of a cell phone? Was Jeffrey Potter involved in an affair when his wife died? There are six witnesses for the plaintiff and four witnesses for the defendants.; The revised Seventh Edition now has four versions: Trial, Faculty, Plaintiff and Defendant. Revision based on the original file created by Kenneth S. Broun and James H. Seckinger.;

Potter v. Shrackle and The Shrackle Construction Company: Deposition File, Plaintiff''s Materials (NITA)

Potter v. Shrackle and The Shrackle Construction Company: Deposition File, Defendant''s Materials (NITA)

<div> When the Flinders Aluminum Fabrication Corporation burns to the ground, killing George Avery, suspicion falls on CEO Arthur Jackson. In fact, Mismo Fire Insurance Company is so certain that the fire was deliberately set that it has denied the insurance claim. Jackson, the sole stockholder in the financially troubled corporation, has filed a civil action to recover damages against Mismo for the denied claim. Mismo asserts that Jackson conspired with others to burn the plant in order to fraudulently collect the insurance policy. Did we mention that the deceased Avery is a suspected "torch," implicated in the burning of two other commercial buildings in Nita City? That reputation isn't helping Jackson's case, but he claims he hired Avery, a talented designer, to help him modernize the Flinders plant. The intrigue grows when it is revealed that one of the witnesses against Jackson has a serious axe to grind that could be clouding her vision. This entertaining file presents a well-balanced case that can be also tried as a condensed or an advanced experience. New to the Eleventh Edition: <ul> <li>Electronic media exhibits</li> <li>Sparky the arson dog</li> <li>New financial parameters</li> </ul> Professors and students will benefit from: <ul> <li>Video depositions</li> <li>The flexibility to use this file as either a brief or an extended exercise</li> <li>Experiential learning opportunities</li> <li>Impeachment exercises</li> </ul> </div>

Flinders Aluminum Fabrication Corporation v. Mismo Fire Insurance Company: Case File, Trial Materials (NITA)

Rose, Laurence M.

Sitterly, Hon. Rebecca

Aspen Publishing

The State of NITA has charged Arthur Jackson and his assistant, Sonia Peterson, with commercial arson. Prosecutors allege that the two conspired with George Avery to burn down the Flinders Aluminum Fabrication factory. 
The original trial resulted in a hung jury, after which Sonia Peterson pled guilty to conspiracy to commit a felony and agreed to testify against Arthur Jackson. Jackson maintains his innocence. Avery cannot testify because he died in the fire. 
There are four witnesses for both the State and the defense. Videos of the fire, deposition statements, and a PowerPoint presentation are available as free downloads. 
A companion civil case file, Flinders v. Mismo, involves Jackson suing to recover from the company that insured the plant. 
New to the Eleventh Edition: Electronic media exhibits Sparky the arson dog New financial parameters 
Professors and students will benefit from: Video depositions The flexibility to use this file as either a brief or an extended exercise Experiential learning opportunities Impeachment exercises

State v. Jackson: Case File, Trial Materials (NITA)

Sitterly, Rebecca Hon.

An inattentive moment costs a woman her life—the question is, which party wasn’t paying attention? 
Charles Shrackle’s truck struck and killed Katherine Potter as she crossed the street in Nita City. In the wrongful death action brought by her estate, the plaintiff claims Shrackle failed to yield to Katherine as she crossed in the crosswalk. Shrackle claims that Mrs. Potter stepped out in front of his truck from the median, well away from the crosswalk. Conflicting eyewitnesses support both versions of the accident. 
This classic file is ideal for teaching basic trial skills. It has been updated to include social media exhibits and text messages, but the basic questions remain. Was Katherine Potter crossing in a crosswalk? Was the accident caused by the use of a cell phone? Was Jeffrey Potter involved in an affair when his wife died? There are six witnesses for the plaintiff and four witnesses for the defendants. 
New to the Eighth Edition: Updated exhibits reflect accurate dates for events 
Professors and students will benefit from: Social media evidence Practice with both fact and expert witness examination

See the best price to sell, buy, or rent books by Rothschild, Frank D.. BookScouter helps to compare book prices from 25+ online bookstores and 30+ buyback vendors with a single search.

Books by Rothschild, Frank D.

See the best price to sell, buy, or rent books by Rothschild, Frank D.. BookScouter helps to compare book prices from 25+ online bookstores and 30+ buyback vendors with a single search.

Powerpoint 2002 for Litigators

Potter v. Shrackle and The Shrackle Construction Company: Case File, Trial Materials (NITA)

Potter v. Shrackle and The Shrackle Construction Company: Deposition File, Faculty Materials (NITA)

Potter v. Shrackle and The Shrackle Construction Company: Deposition File, Plaintiff''s Materials (NITA)

Potter v. Shrackle and The Shrackle Construction Company: Deposition File, Defendant''s Materials (NITA)

Flinders Aluminum Fabrication Corporation v. Mismo Fire Insurance Company: Case File, Trial Materials (NITA)

State v. Jackson: Case File, Trial Materials (NITA)

Potter v. Shrackle and The Shrackle Construction Company: Case File, Trial Materials (NITA)